NVIDIA L40 vs L40S Complete Performance Comparison & Buying Guide 2026

NVIDIA L40 vs L40S: Complete Performance Comparison & Buying Guide 2026

The NVIDIA L40 and L40S represent powerful GPU solutions built on the cutting-edge Ada Lovelace architecture, each meticulously optimized for different workload requirements. While both GPUs share remarkably similar core specifications and an impressive 48GB GDDR6 memory configuration, the L40S offers significantly enhanced AI performance capabilities, making it the superior choice for organizations focused on AI training and inference workloads. The L40, meanwhile, provides exceptional value for graphics-intensive applications and AI inference tasks, delivering professional-grade performance at a more accessible price point.

Both GPUs represent a substantial leap forward from previous generation hardware, incorporating fourth-generation Tensor cores, third-generation RT cores, and support for modern AI frameworks including FP8 precision and NVIDIA’s revolutionary Transformer Engine. The choice between these two powerhouses ultimately depends on your specific workload requirements, budget constraints, and performance priorities.

Comprehensive Specification NVIDIA L40 vs L40S Comparison

Specification NVIDIA L40 NVIDIA L40S NVIDIA RTX A6000
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace Ampere
CUDA Cores 18,176 18,176 10,752
Tensor Cores 4th Gen (568) 4th Gen (568) 3rd Gen
RT Cores 3rd Gen (142) 3rd Gen (142) 2nd Gen
GPU Memory 48GB GDDR6 ECC 48GB GDDR6 ECC 48GB GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth 864 GB/s 864 GB/s 768 GB/s
L2 Cache 96 MB 96 MB 128 MB
RT Core Performance 209 TFLOPS 212 TFLOPS 36.9 TFLOPS
FP32 Performance 91.6 TFLOPS 91.6 TFLOPS 38 TFLOPS
FP16 Performance 362 TFLOPS 733 TFLOPS 77 TFLOPS
FP8 Support ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ✗ No
Transformer Engine ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ✗ No
Power Consumption 300W 350W 300W
Price Range $7,350 – $11,340 $7,000 – $8,000 $4,000 – $5,000

Detailed Technical Analysis

Core Architecture and Performance

Both the L40 and L40S are built on NVIDIA’s revolutionary Ada Lovelace architecture, representing a quantum leap in GPU technology compared to previous generations. This shared architectural foundation includes an impressive array of 18,176 CUDA cores, 568 fourth-generation Tensor cores, and 142 third-generation RT cores. This architectural similarity means both GPUs excel remarkably in parallel processing tasks, AI workloads, and graphics rendering applications, delivering professional-grade performance across a wide spectrum of use cases.

The key differentiator between these two powerhouses lies in their optimization focus and performance tuning. The L40S features significantly enhanced AI capabilities with superior FP16 performance reaching an impressive 733 TFLOPS compared to the L40’s 362 TFLOPS. This substantial performance advantage makes the L40S particularly effective for demanding AI training and inference workloads, where half-precision floating-point operations are critical for achieving optimal performance and efficiency.

NVIDIA L40

Memory and Bandwidth Architecture

Both GPUs feature identical memory configurations with a substantial 48GB of GDDR6 ECC memory and an impressive 864 GB/s memory bandwidth. This generous memory capacity enables seamless handling of large datasets, complex 3D models, and extensive AI models without encountering memory constraints that could bottleneck performance. The inclusion of ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory ensures data integrity throughout computational processes, which is absolutely crucial for professional applications, scientific computing, and long-running computations where data accuracy is paramount.

The 864 GB/s memory bandwidth represents a significant improvement over previous generation GPUs, ensuring that data can be rapidly transferred between the GPU memory and processing cores. This high bandwidth is particularly beneficial for memory-intensive workloads such as large language model inference, high-resolution video processing, and complex scientific simulations that require frequent data access patterns.

AI and Machine Learning Performance

The L40S demonstrates superior AI performance capabilities with comprehensive support for FP8 precision and enhanced Tensor Core capabilities that have been specifically optimized for modern AI workloads. According to extensive NVIDIA benchmarks and real-world testing, the L40S delivers up to an astounding 1,466 TFLOPS in FP8 Tensor Core performance, significantly outpacing the L40’s capabilities in this critical metric. This performance advantage translates directly into faster training times, higher inference throughput, and improved efficiency for AI-driven applications.

For AI inference tasks specifically, the L40S shows remarkable performance improvements that make it an attractive choice for production AI deployments. The GPU delivers up to 5X higher inference performance compared to previous generation GPUs, positioning it as a compelling upgrade path for organizations looking to modernize their AI infrastructure. Additionally, the L40S achieves 1.2X generative AI inference performance compared to the A100, and demonstrates a 1.7X training performance advantage over A100 in specific workloads, particularly those involving transformer-based models and large language models.

The inclusion of NVIDIA’s innovative Transformer Engine in the L40S provides automatic precision optimization between FP8 and FP16 formats, dramatically accelerating AI performance while simultaneously improving memory utilization for both training and inference phases. This intelligent precision management ensures optimal performance without requiring manual intervention or extensive model tuning, making it easier for data scientists and ML engineers to achieve peak performance.

Graphics and Rendering Capabilities

Both GPUs excel remarkably in graphics-intensive applications thanks to their powerful third-generation RT cores and substantial compute capabilities. The L40 offers an impressive 209 TFLOPS of RT core performance, while the L40S provides a slight edge at 212 TFLOPS. This exceptional ray tracing performance makes both GPUs ideal for a wide range of professional graphics applications and creative workflows.

These GPUs are particularly well-suited for real-time ray tracing applications, delivering up to 2X performance improvement over previous generations. This performance boost enables more realistic lighting, reflections, and shadows in real-time applications, enhancing the visual fidelity of everything from architectural visualizations to virtual production environments. For 3D rendering and visualization workflows, both GPUs provide accelerated performance for CAD applications, visual effects production, and architectural visualization, significantly reducing rendering times and improving iterative design processes.

NVIDIA L40S

The GPUs also excel in virtual production environments, supporting high-fidelity creative workflows that demand real-time rendering capabilities. Both the L40 and L40S are fully compatible with NVIDIA Omniverse, enabling cutting-edge metaverse applications, digital twin simulations, and collaborative 3D design workflows that are becoming increasingly important in modern creative and engineering pipelines.

Power Efficiency and Form Factor

The L40 operates at a maximum power consumption of 300W, making it a relatively power-efficient choice for data center deployments where power and cooling costs are significant considerations. The L40S, meanwhile, requires 350W maximum power due to its enhanced performance capabilities and more aggressive performance tuning. While this represents a 50W increase, the additional power consumption is justified by the substantial performance improvements in AI workloads, particularly for organizations where AI performance is the primary priority.

Both GPUs utilize a dual-slot PCIe form factor, ensuring broad compatibility with standard server and workstation configurations. This standardized form factor makes it straightforward to integrate these GPUs into existing infrastructure without requiring specialized chassis or cooling solutions. The passive cooling design employed in both GPUs makes them particularly suitable for multi-GPU deployments in data center environments, where multiple GPUs can be densely packed while maintaining thermal stability and reliability.

Use Case Recommendations

Choose NVIDIA L40 When:

  • Graphics-focused workloads are your primary requirement and AI training is secondary
  • AI inference tasks dominate your workflow rather than training operations
  • Budget considerations are important (typically 10-20% less expensive than L40S)
  • Power efficiency is a concern due to data center power constraints (50W lower consumption)
  • 3D rendering and visualization are core applications for your organization
  • Virtual workstation deployments need reliable, consistent performance
  • Video production workflows require hardware encoding capabilities
  • CAD and engineering applications are primary use cases

Choose NVIDIA L40S When:

  • AI training and inference are primary workloads requiring maximum performance
  • Generative AI applications require high throughput and low latency
  • Mixed precision computing (FP8/FP16) is important for your models
  • Large language model processing is needed for production deployments
  • Multi-modal AI workloads involving text, images, and video processing
  • Maximum AI performance within the Ada Lovelace architecture is required
  • Transformer-based models are central to your AI strategy
  • Future-proofing for evolving AI workload demands is a priority

RTX A6000 Comparison Context

The RTX A6000, based on the older Ampere architecture, serves as a workstation-focused alternative that deserves consideration for certain use cases. While it offers the same 48GB memory capacity as the L40 series, it falls behind in several key performance areas that are critical for modern workloads.

nvidia-quadro-a6000

The performance differences are substantial: the A6000 features only 10,752 CUDA cores compared to 18,176 in the L40 series (47% fewer cores), delivers just 36.9 TFLOPS of RT performance versus 209-212 TFLOPS (5.7X lower), achieves 38 TFLOPS in FP32 performance compared to 91.6 TFLOPS (2.4X lower), and provides 768 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 864 GB/s (11% lower).

However, the RTX A6000 typically costs 20-30% less than the L40 series, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious workstation deployments where cutting-edge AI performance is not the primary requirement. It remains a solid choice for traditional graphics workloads, CAD applications, and moderate AI inference tasks where the additional performance of the L40 series may not justify the cost premium.

Pricing and Availability NVIDIA L40 vs L40S

Current market pricing shows significant variation based on vendor, configuration, and purchase volume. Understanding these pricing dynamics is essential for making informed procurement decisions:

NVIDIA L40

$8,350 – $9,500

Price varies based on vendor, configuration, and support options. Enterprise volume discounts available.

NVIDIA L40S

$10,000 – $11,000

Typically 10-15% premium over L40. Best value for AI-focused workloads with strong ROI for training operations.

RTX A6000

$6,000 – $7,000

Significantly lower cost but older architecture. Good for budget-conscious workstation deployments.

Both L40 and L40S GPUs are available through major OEM partners including Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Lenovo, and Supermicro, ensuring broad availability and support options. Cloud service providers including AWS, Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure also offer these GPUs with flexible hourly rates starting from approximately $1.00/hour for on-demand access, making it easy to test and validate performance before committing to hardware purchases.

Real-World Performance Benchmarks

Based on comprehensive independent benchmarks, user reports, and extensive testing across various workloads, the following performance characteristics have been observed in production environments:

AI Workload Performance

Stable Diffusion XL: The L40S demonstrates a 20-25% improvement over the L40 in image generation tasks, with faster iteration times and improved throughput for batch processing. This performance advantage is particularly noticeable in production environments where generating large volumes of images is required.

LLM Inference: The L40S shows 15-30% better throughput compared to the L40 when serving large language models, with the performance gap widening for larger models (70B+ parameters). The enhanced FP16 and FP8 performance of the L40S enables serving more concurrent requests with lower latency.

Training Workloads: The L40S provides a substantial 1.5-1.7X speedup for smaller models (under 10B parameters), with the advantage being most pronounced in transformer-based architectures that benefit from the Transformer Engine optimization. For larger models, the performance advantage remains significant, though memory bandwidth can become a limiting factor.

Graphics Performance

Blender Rendering: Both the L40 and L40S deliver similar performance in Blender rendering tasks, with differences typically within 3-5% margin. The ray tracing capabilities of both GPUs significantly accelerate Cycles rendering, with complex scenes benefiting from the improved RT core performance.

Real-time Ray Tracing: The L40S shows a marginal 1-2% advantage in real-time ray tracing applications, which is generally not noticeable in practical use. Both GPUs deliver exceptional performance for real-time visualization, architectural walkthroughs, and virtual production workflows.

Video Encoding: Both GPUs provide comparable performance with triple NVENC support, enabling simultaneous encoding of multiple video streams. This capability is particularly valuable for streaming applications, video production workflows, and content creation pipelines that require real-time encoding.

Conclusion and Final Recommendations

For organizations prioritizing AI and machine learning workloads, the L40S represents the superior choice with its enhanced FP16 performance, comprehensive FP8 support, and powerful Transformer Engine capabilities. The 15-20% price premium over the L40 delivers measurable and significant performance improvements in AI-intensive applications, with ROI typically achieved within 6-12 months for organizations running continuous training or high-volume inference workloads.

The L40 remains an excellent choice for graphics-focused workflows, AI inference tasks, and budget-conscious deployments where maximum AI training performance is not the primary requirement. Its lower power consumption (50W less than L40S) and comparable performance in non-AI workloads make it ideal for virtual workstations, 3D rendering, visualization applications, and mixed-use environments where both graphics and AI capabilities are needed.

For workstation-focused deployments with moderate AI requirements and tighter budget constraints, the RTX A6000 provides a cost-effective alternative that still delivers professional-grade performance. However, organizations should carefully consider the architectural limitations compared to the Ada Lovelace-based L40 series, particularly the lack of FP8 support and Transformer Engine capabilities that are becoming increasingly important for modern AI workflows.

Both L40 and L40S represent significant advances in GPU technology, combining exceptional graphics capabilities with cutting-edge AI performance. The choice ultimately depends on your specific workload requirements, performance needs, budget constraints, and long-term technology strategy. The substantial 48GB memory capacity in both GPUs ensures they remain relevant and capable for large-scale applications well into the future, providing excellent investment protection as workload demands continue to evolve.